Pentaho data integration variables
SuiteAnalytics, with a pricing score of 3 is considered less expensive to implement than Pentaho Data Integration with a score of 6. SuiteAnalytics is an alternative Business Intelligence software, SuiteAnalytics installed on-premises or used cloud based, Pentaho Data Integration can be used on-premises and on the cloud. SuiteAnalytics - Best for Growing Companies compare head to head: Sisense Vs Pentaho Data Integration 3.
#Pentaho data integration variables software
Sisense is rated 4.6 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (Sisense offers 35 main features). Sisense, with a pricing score of 4 is considered less expensive to implement than Pentaho Data Integration with a score of 6. Sisense is an alternative Business Intelligence software, Sisense installed on-premises or used cloud based, Pentaho Data Integration can be used on-premises and on the cloud. compare head to head: QlikView Vs Pentaho Data Integration 2. QlikView is rated 4.3 stars by ITQlick experts, both software products offer a good range of features (QlikView offers 15 main features). QlikView, with a pricing score of 3 is considered less expensive to implement than Pentaho Data Integration with a score of 6. QlikView is an alternative Business Intelligence software, QlikView installed on-premises or used cloud based, Pentaho Data Integration can be used on-premises and on the cloud. Compare Recruitment: SmartRecruiters vs.Compare Construction: BuilderTREND vs.So while you can change the value of the variable with javascript or with the set variables step many times, this typically doesn't change anything since the variables were read out once already (although I expect dynamically reading out the variables with javascript would work). I have tested this but unfortunately in 4.01 it doesn't seem to work, at least not for the built-in variable $) in configuration dialogs are resolved once in the init phase of a transformation / job. Variable substitution in Kettle 4.01 and upĪs of Kettle version 4.01, the Calculator step supports a calculation type called "variable substitution in string A" that is intended exactly for that purpose. So, if you need to support variable references inside parameter values, you have to substitute the variables yourself. Kettle doesn't automatically substitute variable references in parameter values (nor in ordinary variable values). In this article I briefly discuss the solution, as I think it may be useful to other kettle users. I just committed revision 64 of kettle-cookbook which should fix this problem. In this case, the variables referenced in the supplied parameter values would be set by adding entries in kettle.properties file. Several kettle-cookbook users ran into problems attempting to use variable references in the values they supplied for the INPUT_DIR and OUTPUT_DIR variables. These allow you to specify the directory that contains the BI content that is to be documented (such as kettle transformation and job files, action sequence files and mondrian schema files), and the directory to store the generated documentation. One of my pet projects, the pentaho auto-documentation solution kettle-cookbook, uses two named parameters called INPUT_DIR and OUTPUT_DIR. Named parameters form a special class of ordinary kettle variables and are intended to clearly and explicitly define for which variables the caller should supply a value. Pentaho Data Integration) jobs and transformations offers support for named parameters (as of version 3.2.0).